1 . Read the following passage carefully and answer the questions given below it. Certain words/phrases are printed in bold to help you to locate them while answering some of the questions.
The writer believes that the work experience should $focus$ more on the development in students of the $ability$ to work with the materials of their environment and solve problems as close to $reality$ as is practicable.
Work experience is included as a separate subject in the school system, should not be treated in the same manner as other school subjects, i.e., accumulation of certain technical facts with a $superficial$ blessing of practical aspect of this new subject in our school curriculum.
Work experience when included as a separate subject in our school $curriculum$ will not doubt entail huge investment. But if the concept of work experience is implemented with a $sincere$ and competent guidance, this above investment will be a great asset to our nation.
Let us suppose, that work experience is designed in such a manner to be productive and self sufficient, it may have some negative reaction from local small scale producers of those consumer goods. However, an assumption is made in the above conviction that the quality of consumer articles produced by a school would be good enough to compete the market.
Ignoring all the inherent dangers discussed earlier of incorporating work experience as a separate subject in our school curriculum, it may still be worthwhile to include work experience level in science teaching even with work experience as a separate subject.
This concept of work experience in science teaching would help to provide a proper training (or development of scientific attitude) in work experience as a separate subject and in useful occupations or vocations to our students. The above training may $encourage$ students to set up small scale industries after their completion of grade ten. This above approach may give some satisfaction to our tax payers that the investment in the educational endeavour is not a total wastage of their money.
The writer's experience (in various countries) suggests that to make work experience a $worthwhile$ experience, it should also be incorporated as an integral part into the high school subjects, especially science subjects. To accomplish this, any school subject especially science must be taught on four levels; the facts level, the concepts level, the values level, and the work experience level.
What is the subject which should not be treated in the same manner as other school subjects ?
A.  Technical subject
B.  Practical aspects of all the sub jects
C.  Work experience
D.  School system and procedures
E.  None of these
View Answer Discuss in Forum
2 . Read the following passage carefully and answer the questions given below it. Certain words/phrases are printed in bold to help you to locate them while answering some of the questions.
The writer believes that the work experience should $focus$ more on the development in students of the $ability$ to work with the materials of their environment and solve problems as close to $reality$ as is practicable.
Work experience is included as a separate subject in the school system, should not be treated in the same manner as other school subjects, i.e., accumulation of certain technical facts with a $superficial$ blessing of practical aspect of this new subject in our school curriculum.
Work experience when included as a separate subject in our school $curriculum$ will not doubt entail huge investment. But if the concept of work experience is implemented with a $sincere$ and competent guidance, this above investment will be a great asset to our nation.
Let us suppose, that work experience is designed in such a manner to be productive and self sufficient, it may have some negative reaction from local small scale producers of those consumer goods. However, an assumption is made in the above conviction that the quality of consumer articles produced by a school would be good enough to compete the market.
Ignoring all the inherent dangers discussed earlier of incorporating work experience as a separate subject in our school curriculum, it may still be worthwhile to include work experience level in science teaching even with work experience as a separate subject.
This concept of work experience in science teaching would help to provide a proper training (or development of scientific attitude) in work experience as a separate subject and in useful occupations or vocations to our students. The above training may $encourage$ students to set up small scale industries after their completion of grade ten. This above approach may give some satisfaction to our tax payers that the investment in the educational endeavour is not a total wastage of their money.
The writer's experience (in various countries) suggests that to make work experience a $worthwhile$ experience, it should also be incorporated as an integral part into the high school subjects, especially science subjects. To accomplish this, any school subject especially science must be taught on four levels; the facts level, the concepts level, the values level, and the work experience level.
According to the writer, the work experience should focus more ...
A. on the development in students of extra curricular activities.
B. on the development in students of the ability to work with the materials of their surroundings.
C. on the ability to solve problems as close to reality as is practicable.
A.  Only A
B.  Only B
C.  Only C
D.  Only B and C
E.  All A, B and C
View Answer Discuss in Forum
3 . Read the following passage carefully and answer the questions given below it. Certain words/phrases are printed in bold to help you to locate them while answering some of the questions.
The writer believes that the work experience should $focus$ more on the development in students of the $ability$ to work with the materials of their environment and solve problems as close to $reality$ as is practicable.
Work experience is included as a separate subject in the school system, should not be treated in the same manner as other school subjects, i.e., accumulation of certain technical facts with a $superficial$ blessing of practical aspect of this new subject in our school curriculum.
Work experience when included as a separate subject in our school $curriculum$ will not doubt entail huge investment. But if the concept of work experience is implemented with a $sincere$ and competent guidance, this above investment will be a great asset to our nation.
Let us suppose, that work experience is designed in such a manner to be productive and self sufficient, it may have some negative reaction from local small scale producers of those consumer goods. However, an assumption is made in the above conviction that the quality of consumer articles produced by a school would be good enough to compete the market.
Ignoring all the inherent dangers discussed earlier of incorporating work experience as a separate subject in our school curriculum, it may still be worthwhile to include work experience level in science teaching even with work experience as a separate subject.
This concept of work experience in science teaching would help to provide a proper training (or development of scientific attitude) in work experience as a separate subject and in useful occupations or vocations to our students. The above training may $encourage$ students to set up small scale industries after their completion of grade ten. This above approach may give some satisfaction to our tax payers that the investment in the educational endeavour is not a total wastage of their money.
The writer's experience (in various countries) suggests that to make work experience a $worthwhile$ experience, it should also be incorporated as an integral part into the high school subjects, especially science subjects. To accomplish this, any school subject especially science must be taught on four levels; the facts level, the concepts level, the values level, and the work experience level.
The concept of work experience in science teaching would help .........
A. to provide proper training in work experience.
B. students to set up small scale industries after the completion of grade ten.
C. to give some satisfaction to our tax payers that they could reap a little more profit from this endeavour.
A.  Only A
B.  Only B
C.  Only C
D.  Only A and B
E.  All A, B and C
View Answer Discuss in Forum
4 . Read the following passage carefully and answer the questions given below it. Certain words/phrases are printed in bold to help you to locate them while answering some of the questions.
The writer believes that the work experience should $focus$ more on the development in students of the $ability$ to work with the materials of their environment and solve problems as close to $reality$ as is practicable.
Work experience is included as a separate subject in the school system, should not be treated in the same manner as other school subjects, i.e., accumulation of certain technical facts with a $superficial$ blessing of practical aspect of this new subject in our school curriculum.
Work experience when included as a separate subject in our school $curriculum$ will not doubt entail huge investment. But if the concept of work experience is implemented with a $sincere$ and competent guidance, this above investment will be a great asset to our nation.
Let us suppose, that work experience is designed in such a manner to be productive and self sufficient, it may have some negative reaction from local small scale producers of those consumer goods. However, an assumption is made in the above conviction that the quality of consumer articles produced by a school would be good enough to compete the market.
Ignoring all the inherent dangers discussed earlier of incorporating work experience as a separate subject in our school curriculum, it may still be worthwhile to include work experience level in science teaching even with work experience as a separate subject.
This concept of work experience in science teaching would help to provide a proper training (or development of scientific attitude) in work experience as a separate subject and in useful occupations or vocations to our students. The above training may $encourage$ students to set up small scale industries after their completion of grade ten. This above approach may give some satisfaction to our tax payers that the investment in the educational endeavour is not a total wastage of their money.
The writer's experience (in various countries) suggests that to make work experience a $worthwhile$ experience, it should also be incorporated as an integral part into the high school subjects, especially science subjects. To accomplish this, any school subject especially science must be taught on four levels; the facts level, the concepts level, the values level, and the work experience level.
What will happen if the work experience is designed to be productive and self-sufficient ?
A.  It may lead to huge investment
B.  It may help the nation in asset building
C.  It may have some negative reaction from the local small scale producers
D.  It may lead to accumulation of certain technical facts
E.  It may lead to better quality goods production
View Answer Discuss in Forum
5 . Read the following passage carefully and answer the questions given below it. Certain words/phrases are printed in bold to help you to locate them while answering some of the questions.
The writer believes that the work experience should $focus$ more on the development in students of the $ability$ to work with the materials of their environment and solve problems as close to $reality$ as is practicable.
Work experience is included as a separate subject in the school system, should not be treated in the same manner as other school subjects, i.e., accumulation of certain technical facts with a $superficial$ blessing of practical aspect of this new subject in our school curriculum.
Work experience when included as a separate subject in our school $curriculum$ will not doubt entail huge investment. But if the concept of work experience is implemented with a $sincere$ and competent guidance, this above investment will be a great asset to our nation.
Let us suppose, that work experience is designed in such a manner to be productive and self sufficient, it may have some negative reaction from local small scale producers of those consumer goods. However, an assumption is made in the above conviction that the quality of consumer articles produced by a school would be good enough to compete the market.
Ignoring all the inherent dangers discussed earlier of incorporating work experience as a separate subject in our school curriculum, it may still be worthwhile to include work experience level in science teaching even with work experience as a separate subject.
This concept of work experience in science teaching would help to provide a proper training (or development of scientific attitude) in work experience as a separate subject and in useful occupations or vocations to our students. The above training may $encourage$ students to set up small scale industries after their completion of grade ten. This above approach may give some satisfaction to our tax payers that the investment in the educational endeavour is not a total wastage of their money.
The writer's experience (in various countries) suggests that to make work experience a $worthwhile$ experience, it should also be incorporated as an integral part into the high school subjects, especially science subjects. To accomplish this, any school subject especially science must be taught on four levels; the facts level, the concepts level, the values level, and the work experience level.
Why the writer suggests that science must be taught on four levels ?
A.  To make the students interested in the subjects
B.  To make them matured citizens of the country
C.  To make work experience a worthwhile experience
D.  To make the science subjects popular among the students
E.  None of these
View Answer Discuss in Forum
6 . Read the following passage carefully and answer the questions given below it. Certain words/phrases are printed in bold to help you to locate them while answering some of the questions.
The writer believes that the work experience should $focus$ more on the development in students of the $ability$ to work with the materials of their environment and solve problems as close to $reality$ as is practicable.
Work experience is included as a separate subject in the school system, should not be treated in the same manner as other school subjects, i.e., accumulation of certain technical facts with a $superficial$ blessing of practical aspect of this new subject in our school curriculum.
Work experience when included as a separate subject in our school $curriculum$ will not doubt entail huge investment. But if the concept of work experience is implemented with a $sincere$ and competent guidance, this above investment will be a great asset to our nation.
Let us suppose, that work experience is designed in such a manner to be productive and self sufficient, it may have some negative reaction from local small scale producers of those consumer goods. However, an assumption is made in the above conviction that the quality of consumer articles produced by a school would be good enough to compete the market.
Ignoring all the inherent dangers discussed earlier of incorporating work experience as a separate subject in our school curriculum, it may still be worthwhile to include work experience level in science teaching even with work experience as a separate subject.
This concept of work experience in science teaching would help to provide a proper training (or development of scientific attitude) in work experience as a separate subject and in useful occupations or vocations to our students. The above training may $encourage$ students to set up small scale industries after their completion of grade ten. This above approach may give some satisfaction to our tax payers that the investment in the educational endeavour is not a total wastage of their money.
The writer's experience (in various countries) suggests that to make work experience a $worthwhile$ experience, it should also be incorporated as an integral part into the high school subjects, especially science subjects. To accomplish this, any school subject especially science must be taught on four levels; the facts level, the concepts level, the values level, and the work experience level.
The idea that to make experience a worthwhile experience, it should also be incorporated as an integral part into the high school subjects comes from ........
A.  his interaction with other writers
B.  his experience in science teaching
C.  his patriotism and love for higher education
D.  his experience in several countries
E.  None of these
View Answer Discuss in Forum
7 . Read the following passage carefully and answer the questions given below it. Certain words/phrases are printed in bold to help you to locate them while answering some of the questions.
The writer believes that the work experience should $focus$ more on the development in students of the $ability$ to work with the materials of their environment and solve problems as close to $reality$ as is practicable.
Work experience is included as a separate subject in the school system, should not be treated in the same manner as other school subjects, i.e., accumulation of certain technical facts with a $superficial$ blessing of practical aspect of this new subject in our school curriculum.
Work experience when included as a separate subject in our school $curriculum$ will not doubt entail huge investment. But if the concept of work experience is implemented with a $sincere$ and competent guidance, this above investment will be a great asset to our nation.
Let us suppose, that work experience is designed in such a manner to be productive and self sufficient, it may have some negative reaction from local small scale producers of those consumer goods. However, an assumption is made in the above conviction that the quality of consumer articles produced by a school would be good enough to compete the market.
Ignoring all the inherent dangers discussed earlier of incorporating work experience as a separate subject in our school curriculum, it may still be worthwhile to include work experience level in science teaching even with work experience as a separate subject.
This concept of work experience in science teaching would help to provide a proper training (or development of scientific attitude) in work experience as a separate subject and in useful occupations or vocations to our students. The above training may $encourage$ students to set up small scale industries after their completion of grade ten. This above approach may give some satisfaction to our tax payers that the investment in the educational endeavour is not a total wastage of their money.
The writer's experience (in various countries) suggests that to make work experience a $worthwhile$ experience, it should also be incorporated as an integral part into the high school subjects, especially science subjects. To accomplish this, any school subject especially science must be taught on four levels; the facts level, the concepts level, the values level, and the work experience level.
Choose the word/group of words which is most nearly the same in meaning as the word/group of words given in $bold$ as used in the passage.
$Encourage $
A.  Animate
B.  Urge
C.  Stimulate
D.  Dissuade
E.  Encroach
View Answer Discuss in Forum
8 . Read the following passage carefully and answer the questions given below it. Certain words/phrases are printed in bold to help you to locate them while answering some of the questions.
The writer believes that the work experience should $focus$ more on the development in students of the $ability$ to work with the materials of their environment and solve problems as close to $reality$ as is practicable.
Work experience is included as a separate subject in the school system, should not be treated in the same manner as other school subjects, i.e., accumulation of certain technical facts with a $superficial$ blessing of practical aspect of this new subject in our school curriculum.
Work experience when included as a separate subject in our school $curriculum$ will not doubt entail huge investment. But if the concept of work experience is implemented with a $sincere$ and competent guidance, this above investment will be a great asset to our nation.
Let us suppose, that work experience is designed in such a manner to be productive and self sufficient, it may have some negative reaction from local small scale producers of those consumer goods. However, an assumption is made in the above conviction that the quality of consumer articles produced by a school would be good enough to compete the market.
Ignoring all the inherent dangers discussed earlier of incorporating work experience as a separate subject in our school curriculum, it may still be worthwhile to include work experience level in science teaching even with work experience as a separate subject.
This concept of work experience in science teaching would help to provide a proper training (or development of scientific attitude) in work experience as a separate subject and in useful occupations or vocations to our students. The above training may $encourage$ students to set up small scale industries after their completion of grade ten. This above approach may give some satisfaction to our tax payers that the investment in the educational endeavour is not a total wastage of their money.
The writer's experience (in various countries) suggests that to make work experience a $worthwhile$ experience, it should also be incorporated as an integral part into the high school subjects, especially science subjects. To accomplish this, any school subject especially science must be taught on four levels; the facts level, the concepts level, the values level, and the work experience level.
Choose the word/group of words which is most nearly the same in meaning as the word/group of words given in $bold$ as used in the passage.
$Superficial $
A.  Artificial
B.  Shallow
C.  Complete
D.  Profound
E.  Imperfect
View Answer Discuss in Forum
9 . Read the following passage carefully and answer the questions given below it. Certain words/phrases are printed in bold to help you to locate them while answering some of the questions.
The writer believes that the work experience should $focus$ more on the development in students of the $ability$ to work with the materials of their environment and solve problems as close to $reality$ as is practicable.
Work experience is included as a separate subject in the school system, should not be treated in the same manner as other school subjects, i.e., accumulation of certain technical facts with a $superficial$ blessing of practical aspect of this new subject in our school curriculum.
Work experience when included as a separate subject in our school $curriculum$ will not doubt entail huge investment. But if the concept of work experience is implemented with a $sincere$ and competent guidance, this above investment will be a great asset to our nation.
Let us suppose, that work experience is designed in such a manner to be productive and self sufficient, it may have some negative reaction from local small scale producers of those consumer goods. However, an assumption is made in the above conviction that the quality of consumer articles produced by a school would be good enough to compete the market.
Ignoring all the inherent dangers discussed earlier of incorporating work experience as a separate subject in our school curriculum, it may still be worthwhile to include work experience level in science teaching even with work experience as a separate subject.
This concept of work experience in science teaching would help to provide a proper training (or development of scientific attitude) in work experience as a separate subject and in useful occupations or vocations to our students. The above training may $encourage$ students to set up small scale industries after their completion of grade ten. This above approach may give some satisfaction to our tax payers that the investment in the educational endeavour is not a total wastage of their money.
The writer's experience (in various countries) suggests that to make work experience a $worthwhile$ experience, it should also be incorporated as an integral part into the high school subjects, especially science subjects. To accomplish this, any school subject especially science must be taught on four levels; the facts level, the concepts level, the values level, and the work experience level.
Choose the word which is most opposite in meaning of the word given in $bold$ as used in the passage.
$Worthwhile $
A.  Valuable
B.  Effortless
C.  Furtile
D.  Useless
E.  Effective
View Answer Discuss in Forum
10 . Read the following passage carefully and answer the questions given below it. Certain words/phrases are printed in bold to help you to locate them while answering some of the questions.
The writer believes that the work experience should $focus$ more on the development in students of the $ability$ to work with the materials of their environment and solve problems as close to $reality$ as is practicable.
Work experience is included as a separate subject in the school system, should not be treated in the same manner as other school subjects, i.e., accumulation of certain technical facts with a $superficial$ blessing of practical aspect of this new subject in our school curriculum.
Work experience when included as a separate subject in our school $curriculum$ will not doubt entail huge investment. But if the concept of work experience is implemented with a $sincere$ and competent guidance, this above investment will be a great asset to our nation.
Let us suppose, that work experience is designed in such a manner to be productive and self sufficient, it may have some negative reaction from local small scale producers of those consumer goods. However, an assumption is made in the above conviction that the quality of consumer articles produced by a school would be good enough to compete the market.
Ignoring all the inherent dangers discussed earlier of incorporating work experience as a separate subject in our school curriculum, it may still be worthwhile to include work experience level in science teaching even with work experience as a separate subject.
This concept of work experience in science teaching would help to provide a proper training (or development of scientific attitude) in work experience as a separate subject and in useful occupations or vocations to our students. The above training may $encourage$ students to set up small scale industries after their completion of grade ten. This above approach may give some satisfaction to our tax payers that the investment in the educational endeavour is not a total wastage of their money.
The writer's experience (in various countries) suggests that to make work experience a $worthwhile$ experience, it should also be incorporated as an integral part into the high school subjects, especially science subjects. To accomplish this, any school subject especially science must be taught on four levels; the facts level, the concepts level, the values level, and the work experience level.
$Ability $
A.  Competency
B.  Aptitude
C.  Ineffciency
D.  Importance
E.  Lethargy
View Answer Discuss in Forum

Test 112 Test 114


Sponsored Links
500
Write your Comment or Discuss..
    Log in | Sign up
    Test 112 Test 114 Test 115 Test 116 Test 117 Test 118
    Advertisements

    Copyright 2019-2020 | Privacy Policy | Terms and Conditions | Contact us | Advertise